FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?

katsuo said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

shiftysatchmo There are fancy hairs in the PS4 version as well xD
I think the only improvement that the PC version will get is the resolution bump to 8k. And maybe HBAO+ or whatever their new “technology” is called.

I doubt the “High Quality” setting in the bench mark uses “max settings”. Either way, they’d have me sold at 1440p60.

gord0 said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

katsuo said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

shiftysatchmo There are fancy hairs in the PS4 version as well xD
I think the only improvement that the PC version will get is the resolution bump to 8k. And maybe HBAO+ or whatever
their new “technology” is called.

I doubt the “High Quality” setting in the bench mark uses “max settings”. Either way, they’d have me sold at 1440p60.

If that resolution bump is enough for you to spend $70CAD, then go for it. Otherwise, pick up the game for PS4 and play it 1080p60

katsuo said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

gord0 said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

katsuo said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

shiftysatchmo There are fancy hairs in the PS4 version as well xD
I think the only improvement that the PC version will get is the resolution bump to 8k. And maybe HBAO+ or whatever
their new “technology” is called.

I doubt the “High Quality” setting in the bench mark uses “max settings”. Either way, they’d have me sold at 1440p60.

If that resolution bump is enough for you to spend $70CAD, then go for it. Otherwise, pick up the game for PS4 and play it 1080p60

That may be my route if I can’t get 1440p60. The reason that’s so big to me is that with ps4 pro on my main monitor I have these options for resolution:
-1080p stretched to 1440p which looks crap
-4k/pseudo 4k scaled down to 1080p and then stretched up to 1440p which looks worse than just regular 1080p stretched to 1440p.

Which is why I have a small 1080p monitor for my consoles.

So yeah, the option for native 1440p is worth more to me than others.

What’s crazy is FF XII is $50 lololol what a ripoff

Maybe the difference between AMD and Nvidia is less when running standard quality and leave Hairworks and the others out of the picture.

buttstallion Replying to myself. No, you are wrong, no difference in the list :smiley: And somehow my 1070 beat the 1070 Ti avarage :smiley: Vega is a bit closer.

Well since there is no 2560x1080 resolution for ultrawide monitors I’m stuck with 1920X1080 and it looks like I can play it. :smiley:

1 Like

seems like my shit pc can handle this game with a shitty resolution pretty well :3

dante said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

seems like my shit pc can handle this game with a shitty resolution pretty well :3

Do you have a playstation?

gord0 nah man i aint that rich :3

dante said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

gord0 nah man i aint that rich :3

You should challenge some gullible people to a game of poker or blackjack. Win. Then go get one. Me complaining about 1080p vs 1440p is one thing, but sub-1080p is something else entirely.

gord0 lol if earning money was that easy i would have done that long ago :3

dante said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

gord0 lol if earning money was that easy i would have done that long ago :3

Are they that expensive used?

gord0 yah its pretty expensive here

Thread resurection! I got new shit! So I get to post new results!

1080p high quality:

4k high quality:

1 Like

gord0 I wonder when a standard card will be able to run a current AAA game at 60 fps

shiftysatchmo said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

gord0 I wonder when a standard card will be able to run a current AAA game at 60 fps

My fury x was doing pretty well with some of them at 1440p.

gord0 Fury X definitely has the occasional struggle in newer games. I suspect the 4GB of RAM is the problem. I’m holding out for the next gen of cards. Hopefully they use less power and generate less heat than the Fury X and Vega do…

teh_g said in FFXV Only 30 USD?!?!?!?!?:

gord0 Fury X definitely has the occasional struggle in newer games. I suspect the 4GB of RAM is the problem. I’m holding out for the next gen of cards. Hopefully they use less power and generate less heat than the Fury X and Vega do…

4gb was definately a bottleneck. Didn’t see heat issues as the fury x is liquid cooled by default. I’ve honestly lost faith in AMD to make good cards since they stopped making flagship cards. Even the best vega is only mid range when stacked against nvidia’s lineup.

gord0 The heat is more a side effect of wattage. The card itself stays nice and cool, but it dumps heat into my office like a nice space heater :smiley:

I just find it so hard to support Nvidia since they are so anti-consumer. It stinks.